Questions, Answers and Presuppositions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13053/cys-19-4-2327Keywords:
Question, answer, presupposition, entailment, wide-scope vs. narrow-scope negation, Transparent Intensional Logic, TIL.Abstract
The paper deals with empirical questions that come attached with a presupposition. In case that the presupposition is not true, there is no unambiguous direct answer. In such a case an adequate complete answer is a negated presupposition. Yet these simple ideas are connected with a bunch of problems. First, we must distinguish between a pragmatic and semantic presupposition, and thus also between a presupposition and mere entailment. Second, we show that the common definition of a presupposition of a question as such a proposition that is entailed by every possible answer to the question is not precise. We follow Frege and Strawson in treating survival under negation as the most important test for presupposition. But a negative answer to a question is often ambiguous. The ambiguity consists in not distinguishing between two kinds of negative answers, to wit the answers applying narrow-scope or wide-scope negation. While the former preserves presupposition, the latter seems to be presupposition denying. We show that in order that the negative answer be unambiguous, instead of the wide-scope negation presumably denying presupposition, an adequate and unambiguous answer is just the negated presupposition. Having defined presupposition of a question more precisely, we then examine Yes-No questions, Wh-questions and exclusive-or questions with respect to several kinds of presupposition triggers. These include inter alia topic-focus articulation, verbs expressing termination of an activity, factive verbs, the „whys and how comes“, and past or future tense with reference time interval. Our background theory is Transparent Intensional Logic (TIL) with its procedural semantics. TIL is an expressive logic apt for analysis of questions and presuppositions, because within TIL we work with partial functions, in particular with propositions with truth-value gaps. These features enabled us to define a general analytic schema of sentences associated with a presupposition. Our results are applicable in linguistics and artificial intelligence, in particular in the systems the behaviour of which is controlled by communication and reasoning of intelligent social agents.Downloads
Published
2015-12-18
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Hereby I transfer exclusively to the Journal "Computación y Sistemas", published by the Computing Research Center (CIC-IPN),the Copyright of the aforementioned paper. I also accept that these
rights will not be transferred to any other publication, in any other format, language or other existing means of developing.I certify that the paper has not been previously disclosed or simultaneously submitted to any other publication, and that it does not contain material whose publication would violate the Copyright or other proprietary rights of any person, company or institution. I certify that I have the permission from the institution or company where I work or study to publish this work.The representative author accepts the responsibility for the publicationof this paper on behalf of each and every one of the authors.
This transfer is subject to the following conditions:- The authors retain all ownership rights (such as patent rights) of this work, except for the publishing rights transferred to the CIC, through this document.
- Authors retain the right to publish the work in whole or in part in any book they are the authors or publishers. They can also make use of this work in conferences, courses, personal web pages, and so on.
- Authors may include working as part of his thesis, for non-profit distribution only.
